This AI Supercomputer can fit on your desk…

by

The Device: Nvidia DGX Spark

  • Form Factor: Extremely small (described as fitting in the palm of a hand or similar to a coffee cup), contrasting sharply with massive AI servers like the original DGX-1.

  • Specs:

    • Chip: GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip (20-core ARM processor).

    • Performance: One petaflop of AI compute.

    • Memory: 128 GB of unified memory (LPDDR5X), shared between CPU and GPU.

    • Connectivity: 10-gig Ethernet port.

    • Power: 240 Watts.

    • Cost: ~$4,000 (Founders Edition), with OEM versions possibly cheaper (~$3,000).

The Comparison: “Larry” (Spark) vs. “Terry” (Custom PC)

  • Terry (Custom Build): A large desktop PC with dual Nvidia RTX 4090s (total 48GB VRAM) costing ~$5,000+ and consuming ~1100 Watts.

  • Larry (DGX Spark): The new small device.

  • Inference Speed Test (Chatting/Generating):

    • Small Model (Qwen 38B): Terry won easily (132 tokens/sec vs. Larry’s 36 tokens/sec).

    • Image Generation: Terry generated 20 images rapidly (11 iterations/sec), while Larry struggled (1 iteration/sec).

    • Verdict: For pure speed (inference) on standard models, the custom PC with 4090s (“Terry”) is much faster.

Where “Larry” (Spark) Shines

Despite being slower at simple inference, the Spark excels in specific areas where consumer GPUs fail:

  1. Massive Memory Capacity:

    • The Spark has 128 GB of unified memory available to the GPU.

    • Advantage: It can run huge models or multi-agent systems that simply crash on a 4090 (which is limited to 24GB VRAM). The reviewer demonstrated running three models simultaneously (using ~89GB RAM), which “Terry” could not do.

  2. Training & Fine-Tuning:

    • Because of the high VRAM, the Spark can train larger models (e.g., Llama 3 70B) that consumer cards can’t even load.

    • It allows developers to fine-tune models locally without renting expensive cloud GPUs.

  3. FP4 Quantization Support:

    • The hardware is optimized to run FP4 (4-bit floating point) quantization natively.

    • This allows it to run models more efficiently with less quality loss compared to consumer cards that have to simulate this in software.

    • It enables Speculative Decoding, where a small, fast model drafts tokens and a large model verifies them, speeding up text generation.

Ease of Use

  • Nvidia Sync App: Allows easy connection via SSH without complex setup. It integrates with VS Code and Cursor.

  • Remote Access: The reviewer recommends using Twin Gate (a sponsor) to securely access the device remotely without exposing ports.

Conclusion

  • Not for Gamers/Enthusiasts: If you want fast chat responses or image generation, a high-end consumer PC (like the 4090 build) is better and faster.

  • Great for Developers: The target audience is AI developers and data scientists who need to fine-tune models or run massive multi-agent workflows locally without relying on the cloud.

  • Value: At ~$4,000, it’s a specialized tool. It offers capabilities (like 128GB VRAM) that are otherwise very expensive or impossible to get in a consumer form factor.

 

The prayer mad me cry dude. Anyone who has been in tech knows how hard it’s been, and lord knows how hard it’s been for me. Words can not express how grateful I am for you and for that payer. Thank you, Chuck. I had to deactivate my YouTube extension to type this so you know it’s deep.

Finally a review on digits i have been waiting so long Edit: I watched the full video bro’s really trying hard not to call this a bad product . It would actually make a great buy if it was under 2K and loved the prayer at last, god bless you too brother

SPARK is not for everyone. It’s a niche product where if your company is deploying workflows on DGX cluster, you now can test it out directly on SPARK and then do the full development process before copy pasting it to the full DGX. There was no low-end dev option out there prior to this. The OS is the same and SDKs/libraries/ etc all are compatible. That is where the value is. And that value is not really going to be realized by those who really don’t have that DGX cluster to deploy things on.

So this is more of an enterprise solution imo for engineers who do software development to run on DGXs. No for average tinkerer (unless you really want it for that small footprint, which is valid).

I am a new Agriculture Scientist and I’m also big on data privacy. I already travel a lot for agriculture and agribusiness research. I anticipate the possibility of using this to train models on genetics, plant pathology, and other predictive solutions that can analyze far more data far faster than I ever could by myself, and in a form factor I can take with me to any university or business without having to worry about an internet connection.

Leave a Comment